Analysis of 230,410 Warframe Steam Reviews
100% of players mentioning battle pass recommend the game
β₁ = +1.491 (increases by +344% per 1,000 hours)
Sample: ONLY 2 reviews | Average playtime: 55,808 hours
⚠️ CRITICAL WARNING: Sample size too small (n=2) for reliable statistical conclusions. Effect size may be spurious.
With only 2 reviews mentioning Nightwave, no statistical conclusions can be drawn. The massive coefficient (β₁=+1.491) and absurdly wide confidence interval (±775 units) reflect extreme statistical uncertainty. Both reviewers were ultra-veterans (55k+ hours) who recommended the game, but this tells us virtually nothing about the battle pass's actual impact on the broader player base.
Insufficient data for analysis. Nightwave is rarely mentioned in reviews (2/230,410 = 0.0009%), suggesting it's either non-controversial or players don't prioritize discussing it. The positive effect size is statistically meaningless.
Only 2 data points - curve is meaningless statistical artifact.
β₁ = +1.491 with absurdly wide CI [-774, +777] - statistically meaningless with n=2.
Two ultra-veteran players (55k hours each), both recommended - cannot generalize.
With 2 data points, residual analysis is not applicable.
Was this model helpful?