Destiny 2 — Story & Narrative
About This Model
Story & Narrative Content - Bayesian Analysis Results
Analysis of 1,085,660 Destiny 2 Steam Reviews
📊 Statistical Finding (LEAST HARMFUL IN DESTINY 2)
Measured effect: -0.8% per 1,000 hours
β₁ = -0.008 (decreases recommendation likelihood)
Sample: 207 reviews | Least harmful monetization in D2
📊 Key Numbers
- 207 reviews specifically mention story or narrative content
- Effect size: -0.8% per 1,000 hours (least harmful in Destiny 2, but still negative)
- Comparison: 7.3x milder than Battle Pass (-5.8%), comparable to Warframe Story (+0.1% neutral)
- Largest sample: Most reviews (n=207) suggests story frequently discussed positively
Interpretation:
Story shows the LEAST HARMFUL effect in Destiny 2 (β₁=-0.008, -0.8% per 1k hours), though still negative unlike Warframe's neutral Story (+0.1%). With 207 reviews (largest sample alongside DLC), it's frequently discussed. The minimal negative effect suggests story quality partially buffers monetization criticism, but DLC paywall prevents it from being genuinely positive like Warframe's narrative elements.
✅ What Makes It Least Harmful:
- Quality Narrative: Expansion storytelling is well-executed and engaging
- Lore Depth: World-building creates meaningful investment beyond mechanics
- Frequent Discussion: n=207 shows story is important to players, mostly positively
- Redemptive Element: Narrative quality softens overall monetization dissatisfaction
⚠️ Why Still Negative:
- DLC Paywall: $40 expansions lock story content behind payment
- Seasonal Gating: Story tied to seasonal structures creates FOMO pressure
- Contrast to Warframe: D2's story is paywalled vs Warframe's free narrative access
Bottom Line:
Least harmful at -0.8%. Story quality buffers dissatisfaction but DLC paywall prevents positive effect. All D2 mechanics remain negative, unlike Warframe's mixed profile.
📊 Statistical Analysis - Four Panel Breakdown
Panel 1: Probability Curve
Nearly flat slope showing -0.8% decrease - least harmful mechanic in Destiny 2.
Panel 2: Effect Estimate
β₁ = -0.008, minimal negative - story quality buffers monetization criticism.
Panel 3: Playtime Distribution
207 reviews (largest sample) showing narrative appreciation across all playtime levels.
Panel 4: Residuals
Good fit confirming story quality consistently resonates despite DLC paywall.
Was this model helpful?